Masa Jabatan Hakim Konstitusi dalam Pasal 87 Huruf B Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi

Authors

  • Khaira Tul Afda UIN Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar
  • Dian Pertiwi UIN Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar

Keywords:

Siyasah Dusturiyah, Masa Jabatan Hakim, Mahkamah Konstitusi

Abstract

This study examines the Term of Office of Constitutional Justices in Article 87 letter b of Law Number 7 of 2020 concerning the Constitutional Court. The formulation of the problem 1. How is Article 87 letter b of Law No. 7 of 2020 concerning the Constitutional Court disharmonized with the Government Administration Law? 2. What is the tenure of constitutional judges in fiqh siyasa dusturiyah? This research is a normative juridical research, namely a type of library research to obtain the materials that the authors use is sourced from primary materials, namely books and secondary materials, namely through scientific writing journals and related literature. The results of this study are the addition of the term of office of constitutional judges in article 87 letter b of Law Number 7 of 2020 concerning the Constitutional Court that the current serving judge applies to the current serving judge and will be honorably discharged at the age of 70 years. The government should implement this regulation for judges who will serve in the next period. Meanwhile, based on siyasa dusturiyah, the tenure of judges in fiqh siyasa dusturiyah does not have specific provisions. a judge who resigns is not immediately released from his duties until a new official is appointed and if a judge dies or is dismissed by someone who is not entitled to dismiss him, a new appointment is not needed because basically he exercises general powers in the field of justice from the people and tries on behalf of the people.

References

Bambang, S. (2010).. Pembentukan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 7.

Ghafur, J. (n.d.).. Urgensi Legislasi Nasional (PROLEGNAS) Dalam Pembentukan Undah-Undang Evaluasi Capaian Program Legislasi Nasional Tahun 2005-2009 Dan Tahun 2010-2014.

Hanif, A. (2015). Masa Jabatan Jaksa Agung Dalam Perspektif Fiqih Siyasah. Jurnal Studi Keislaman., 1.

Kansil, C. . (2009). Kamus Istila Hukum.Gramedia Pustaka.Jakarta.

Kariadi. (2020). Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 “Saat Ini Dan Esok”. Justisi. ( No. 2), Vol 6.

Konstitusi, M. (2003). Membangun Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Institusi Peradilan Konstitusi yang Moderen Dan Terpercaya.

Mertukusumo, S. (n.d.). Mengenal Hukum. Liberty. Yogyakarta.

Mulyono, E. Arudhati, G. B. Anggono, B. D. Dan Ulum, M. B. (2016). No Title. Kumpulan Artikel Dan Gagasan Ilmiah Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Rangka Meneguhkan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Yang Moderen Dan Terpercaya. UPT Penerbit Universitas Jember. Jember.

Nasihah, U. (2012). Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia Dan Di Maroko. Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah. Jakarta.

Ridlwan, Z. (2012). Negara Hukum Indonesia Kebalikan Nachtwachterstaa. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum., Vol 5.

Roni, zurneti ahmad dan efendi. (2018). Z. Konstitusi Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Normative, 6.

Sri, asmarianti dan yunarti. (2022). Analisis Sultah Qadaiyyah Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 36/PUU-XV/2017 Terkait Kedudukan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Integritaso Ilmu Syari’ah. Vol 3, volume 3.

Sugiarto, U. S. 2013. pengantar hukum indonesia.

Subiyanto, A. E. (2012). Mendesai Kewenangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-26

How to Cite

Afda, K. T., & Pertiwi, D. (2023). Masa Jabatan Hakim Konstitusi dalam Pasal 87 Huruf B Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Mantagi: Journal of Interlegality, 1(1), 27–35. Retrieved from https://mantagiinstitute.or.id/ojs/index.php/mji/article/view/8

Issue

Section

Articles